XPS vs. ISO: A better choice for below grade

 

ISO and XPS foam – what’s the difference?

Unfaced polyisocyanurate (polyiso or ISO) foam does not have the same moisture, thermal or compressive strength properties as Styrofoam™ Brand XPS. For below-grade applications likely to encounter wet, low-temp as well as heavy construction equipment, Styrofoam™ Brand XPS has proven to stand the test of time over and over again.

Moisture
XPS structure absorbs significantly less water than polyiso products
See chart

R-Value
XPS maintains R-value better than polyiso at lower temperatures
See chart

 Compressive Strength
XPS is available in a wide range of compressive strengths
See chart

 

 
 
 

ISO and XPS foam – what’s the difference?

R-Value Retention
DuPont Styrofoam Brand XPS can outperform other insulation materials in maintaining R-value, even in extremely cold temperatures.
See chart

Compressive Strength Options
Styrofoam Brand XPS offers a variety of compressive strengths for both horizontal and vertical below-grade applications.

Lower Moisture Absorption
Styrofoam Brand XPS has significantly better moisture absorption properties, with only 0.1% absorption.1 Resilience to Long-Term Water Exposure Styrofoam Brand XPS delivers top performance and durability even in harsh conditions.2

Convenience
Styrofoam Brand XPS cuts easily and cleanly with a score and a snap, resulting in minimal mess and waste.

Technical information
Below-Grade Efficiency: Maximizing Performance with
Styrofoam Brand Insulation

 
 
 

A unique closed-cell structure gives Styrofoam™ Brand XPS its exceptional moisture resistance and enables it to retain a high, long-term R-value of R-5 per inch – even after exposure to standing water, wet soil and other damp conditions

Additional performance attributes of Styrofoam™ Brand XPS include: 

  • Meets ASTM C578 Types (refer to specific product information for details)
  • Compliant with ICC-ESR 4755
  • Provides a weather-resistant barrier to enhance the building’s resistance to air and moisture penetration
  • Meets building code requirements of ASTM E84 Flame Spread Index of 25 or less and a Smoke Developed Rating of 450 or less
  • Will not corrode, rot or support mold growth
  • Available in wide range of compressive strengths from 15 to 100 psi, and minimum flexural strength of 40 psi 
  • Offered in various sizes, thicknesses and edge treatments to meet specific design needs, while ensuring energy efficiency and minimizing on-site cutting and waste
 
 
 
 
 
 

DuPont™ Styrofoam™ Brand XPS products are backed by the expertise of building science leaders dedicated to your success and warranties from a name you trust, including limited thermal warranties from 15 to 50 years including the Wall² system warranties and other system warranties.


 
 
 
 
 
 

Any questions?

 The Styrofoam™ Brand was the original XPS, creating the product segment. Rooted in 80+ years of technical innovation, we’re excited to deliver a low-GWP XPS solution.

Let’s start a conversation about your next project.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Resources

Styrofoam™ Brand XPS Compliance Letter

Download PDF ↓

Low GWP Grey Styrofoam™ Brand XPS EPD
(as sold in Canada and non-HFC regulated states)

US (English) ➞

Canadian (English) ➞

Canadian (French) ➞

 

Physical Property Equivalency Letter

Download PDF ↓

Customer Processing and Transport Safe Handling

Download English PDF ↓
Download French PDF ↓

Customer Processing and Transport Safe Handling
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Safe Processing & Handling Graphic

Download PDF ↓

Styrofoam™ Brand Product Brochure

Download PDF ↓

Solar Exposure Technical Bulletin

Low GWP – Canada (English) PDF ↓

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Styrofoam™️ Brand Low GWP XPS LEED Optimization Document - Embodied Carbon Assessment

Download PDF ↓

 
 
 

1 Typical value tested per ASTM C272, % by volume.
2Billy Connor, April 2019. “Comparison of Polystyrene Expanded and Extruded Foam Insulation in Roadway and Airport Embankments”. Alaska University Transportation Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, (INE/AUTC 19.08).
http://autc.uaf.edu/projects/2019/comparison-of-polystyrene-expandedand-extruded-foam-insulation-in-roadway-and-airport-embankments/